,

𝗦𝗰𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗺𝘀 𝗜𝗜 𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗶𝗹𝘆 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗱: summary flowchart

In last week pills I shared the full Schrems II decision which invalidates the #PrivacyShield

The judgment has important implications for companies transferring data outside the EU, and potentially on service contracts with non-EU suppliers, in particular contracts for the provision of IT services which provide for the possibility for suppliers’ staff outside Europe to access the data, even if hosted in databases within the European territory.

However, as many struggle to districate within the 63 pages of the CJEU decision to identify what are the actual consequences for their contracts and what happens to the Standard contractual clauses (SCC) which they have in place, here’s a synthetic #flowchart which answers some of the Key FAQs on Scherms II implications.

Shoot me a message for the pdf file

This is just an example of how legal concepts can be made easy, and, as always, make sure to consult your legal advisor to have the full picture.
You can access the full Supervisory Authority FAQs which I used as source here.

We have already been kept really busy this week, and another hot topic we tackled is whether access from foreign personnel to EU databases constitutes a data transfer.

To help organizations identify and manage the privacy risks associated with the transfer of personal data regulated by GDPR to third countries that do not benefit from an adequacy decision by the European Commission, the law firm which I work with has developed an ad-hoc methodology, aligned with the requirements of European legislation following the Schrems II judgment. The methodology provides a basis for exporters and importers of data to assess safeguard measures, taking into account a number of factors, in order to calculate the level of risk of each transfer, and to provide an accurate, consistent, verifiable and defensible basis to support a case-by-case decision to proceed or continue a given transfer. Contact me if you wish to know more.

Get ready to negotiate with your non-EU counter-parties.

, ,

Innovazione Legale: webinar su LegalTech & Legal Design

💡𝗜𝗻𝗻𝗼𝘃𝗮𝘇𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗟𝗲𝗴𝗮𝗹𝗲: #LegalTech & #LegalDesign. Quale sarà il futuro della nostra professione?

Il #webinar definitivo per passare dalle buzzwords alle applicazioni concrete.

🔸Quali opportunità sono sul tavolo?

🔸Quali strumenti utilizzare per coglierle?

🔸Quali sfide affrontare per stare al passo con l’evoluzione in atto nel mercato legale?

Ne parleremo con giursiti d’impresa Giorgia Vulcano Fausto Tramontin, esponenti del mondo accademico Alessandra Salluce e colleghi che si occupano, come me, di #LegalInnovation quotidianamente Luca Visconti Antonio Ravenna

Quando?

Venerdì 15 Maggio – Ore 16:00

Come si partecipa?

Iscriviti ora – gratuitamente – al link qui ⬅️

Per restare aggiornato sulla community di giovani innovatori segui > TechnoLawgy Telegram channel <

💡#LEGALDESIGN: how to write attention catching emails?

LGL + DSGN = (legal design)

Innovative Legal professionals are always looking for an holistic approach to develop new models of user-friendly, accessible, and engaging legal services. That’s when legal design comes in: combining #DesignThinking with the world of law, to make legal systems and services more human-centered, usable, and satisfying. Do you know how to write attention catching emails? Here’s an example found online which has been attributed to Gary Provost.

💊 #TechLaw pill nr. 52 💊

legal design attention catching emails

legal design attention catching emails

Enter a short headline summarizing why this email is important

This sentence has five words. Here are five more words. Five-word sentences are fine. But several together become monotonous. Listen to what is happening. The writing is getting boring. The sound of it drones. The ear demands some variety.

Now listen. I vary the sentence length, and I create music. Music. The writing sings. It has a pleasant rhythm, a lilt, a harmony. I use short sentences, And I use sentences of medium length.

And sometimes, when I am certain the reader is rested, I will engage him with a sentence of considerable length, a sentence that bums with energy and builds with all the impetus of crescendo, the roll of the drums the crash of the cymbal sounds that say listen to this, it is important.

Enter a compelling CTA. i.e., NOT “click here”

*This post is part of my #TechLaw pill series which is weekly available on > TechnoLawgy Telegram channel <

If you think this information is valuable, repay my effort and share it on your #SocialMedia, Be Influent! 

Legal Design attention catching emails